🔗 Share this article

Within the opening pages of the book Authentic, author Burey poses a challenge: commonplace directives to “be yourself” or “show up completely genuine at work” are not harmless encouragements for personal expression – they can be pitfalls. This initial publication – a blend of personal stories, investigation, societal analysis and conversations – attempts to expose how companies co-opt identity, shifting the weight of corporate reform on to staff members who are frequently at risk.

Professional Experience and Broader Context

The driving force for the book stems partly in the author’s professional path: multiple jobs across retail corporations, startups and in global development, interpreted via her experience as a disabled Black female. The conflicting stance that Burey experiences – a tension between expressing one’s identity and seeking protection – is the core of her work.

It arrives at a time of collective fatigue with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as resistance to DEI initiatives mount, and many organizations are cutting back the very frameworks that earlier assured transformation and improvement. Burey enters that arena to contend that withdrawing from authenticity rhetoric – namely, the organizational speech that reduces individuality as a set of aesthetics, peculiarities and pastimes, leaving workers preoccupied with handling how they are perceived rather than how they are handled – is not a solution; we must instead redefine it on our own terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Display of Persona

Through vivid anecdotes and interviews, Burey illustrates how underrepresented staff – employees from diverse backgrounds, LGBTQ+ individuals, women workers, people with disabilities – soon understand to calibrate which persona will “pass”. A vulnerability becomes a drawback and people compensate excessively by working to appear agreeable. The effort of “presenting your true self” becomes a reflective surface on which various types of anticipations are projected: affective duties, disclosure and constant performance of appreciation. According to Burey, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but absent the safeguards or the trust to endure what arises.

‘In Burey’s words, we are asked to share our identities – but absent the protections or the confidence to endure what arises.’

Case Study: An Employee’s Journey

The author shows this dynamic through the story of Jason, a employee with hearing loss who chose to educate his colleagues about the culture of the deaf community and communication practices. His readiness to talk about his life – a gesture of transparency the office often applauds as “genuineness” – temporarily made everyday communications more manageable. But as Burey shows, that progress was fragile. After staff turnover eliminated the informal knowledge he had established, the atmosphere of inclusion vanished. “All the information departed with those employees,” he notes wearily. What stayed was the weariness of being forced to restart, of being held accountable for an company’s developmental journey. From the author’s perspective, this demonstrates to be asked to expose oneself absent defenses: to endanger oneself in a system that applauds your honesty but declines to codify it into procedure. Authenticity becomes a trap when institutions count on personal sharing rather than organizational responsibility.

Literary Method and Idea of Resistance

The author’s prose is simultaneously clear and lyrical. She blends scholarly depth with a style of connection: an invitation for audience to lean in, to question, to oppose. According to the author, professional resistance is not noisy protest but principled refusal – the act of rejecting sameness in workplaces that demand appreciation for mere inclusion. To resist, in her framing, is to interrogate the stories companies describe about equity and acceptance, and to refuse involvement in customs that sustain injustice. It might look like calling out discrimination in a discussion, withdrawing of uncompensated “diversity” effort, or establishing limits around how much of one’s identity is offered to the company. Opposition, the author proposes, is an assertion of personal dignity in settings that typically encourage conformity. It represents a discipline of principle rather than opposition, a method of insisting that an individual’s worth is not dependent on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

The author also avoids inflexible opposites. The book avoids just eliminate “genuineness” completely: instead, she urges its restoration. For Burey, authenticity is far from the unfiltered performance of individuality that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more intentional alignment between one’s values and individual deeds – a honesty that rejects manipulation by corporate expectations. Rather than considering authenticity as a mandate to overshare or conform to cleansed standards of openness, the author encourages followers to maintain the parts of it rooted in honesty, self-awareness and ethical clarity. From her perspective, the goal is not to abandon genuineness but to shift it – to remove it from the executive theatrical customs and into relationships and workplaces where confidence, fairness and answerability make {